I'm Alex Lagios. I take on the parts of a company that aren't working — the model, the positioning, the operations underneath — and I take ownership instead of a bigger fee, because I'd rather be paid for whether it works than for the hours it took. Most of it starts as a paid engagement. Some of it becomes a partnership.
Capital is the easy part to find. Someone who'll do the work isn't.
Usually combined, because the problems usually are. Here's how I plug in — besides drinking too much coffee.
I co-build the business model, the metrics that matter, and the first ninety days of execution — then stay through the quarter that proves it works. Sometimes that starts from a napkin. More often it starts from chaos.
Positioning that survives contact with a real market, an identity system your team can run without me, and the campaigns that carry it. I build the thing and hand you the keys — I don't rent you a dependency.
I map what's actually happening — not what the org chart says — cut the steps nobody defends, and leave behind systems that hold under load. Unglamorous work. Usually where the fastest margin is hiding.
I own the technical side the way I own the rest of it — what gets built, what doesn't, and whether it can be afforded once it's live. The building itself goes through The Creative Collective, the studio I co-run, so a business I'm in gets a product team without having to hire one.
Nobody should sign a multi-year partnership off one conversation. So we don't — we start with paid work, and the partnership is a decision we both make later, with evidence.
A defined problem, a defined deliverable, an end date agreed before anything starts. You pay for it like any other engagement, and it ends there unless we both want more. This is how we find out whether we work well together without either of us signing something we can't undo.
If the work goes well and the business is one I want to be in, the engagement converts: I take equity or a share of revenue and go from working on the business to being in it. Neither of us has to decide that up front, and most engagements simply finish instead.
Which of the two applies depends on the business, not on my preference. A company heading for a raise and a family business with good margins want opposite things, and the structure should follow that rather than fight it.
I take ownership and I'm in the business properly — the upside and the downside. This suits companies where the value being built is the company itself, and where my work compounds into something that gets sold or funded rather than distributed.
A share of what the business makes, rather than a piece of the business. This suits profitable companies that aren't going anywhere — where the point is to make the machine run better and split what that produces, not to build toward a sale.
There is one of me and a partnership runs for years, so the constraint is real rather than a negotiating position.
Most of the time there has to be a machine to improve, because the work is making an existing thing run better. But pre-revenue is a bias rather than a rule: if the idea genuinely interests me, that is its own reason, and those are the ones where an operating partner is worth the most anyway.
This only works with people who will let someone else own a decision. If what you want is capacity to execute your plan, hire a team — you will be happier and it will cost you less.
The model, the positioning, or the operations underneath. If the problem is that the market does not want the product, no amount of operating work fixes that, and I would rather say so in the first conversation.
Partnerships are measured in years, not sprints. I take on very few because there is one of me — that constraint is real, and it is why the paid engagement comes first.
Ideas don't matter. Execution does. Three commitments shape every engagement — and they're the reason I turn work down when the fit is wrong.
I'm not here to hand you a deck and disappear. I work inside your tools, show up when I say I will, and own outcomes next to the people who have to live with them. Partnership beats PowerPoints every time.
Ideas don't matter. Execution does. The first artifact of an engagement is something working — a process running, a page live, a system in production — not a strategy document that ages on a shared drive.
Growth that shows up in your numbers and your day-to-day. I'm not scared to execute, and I'm still there when the result lands. If it didn't work, we go back to the drawing board together — and that's still progress.
Elevate Partners is one person. You get the name on this page on every call, in your tools, and on the commit history — no account manager in front, no junior behind.
I started Elevate to be the kind of partner I kept looking for and couldn't find — one who builds the thing instead of describing it. You get me on the call, in your tools, and on the commit history. Allergic to talk without action.
Elevate Partners is Alex Lagios, working as an operating partner. I take on the parts of a company that aren't working — the business model, the positioning, or the operations underneath — and I take equity or a share of revenue instead of a bigger fee. Most of it starts as a paid engagement with a defined scope; some of those convert into partnerships. It is not an agency and not a consultancy, and there is no team behind it.
No. I invest time, which is the part most companies actually can't buy. Capital is comparatively easy to find, and there are a lot of people who will give you money and advice — there are very few who will come and do the work. If what you need is funding, I'm the wrong call, and I'd rather say so quickly than take a meeting about it.
In two steps. It starts as a paid engagement with a defined problem, a defined deliverable and an end date, which you pay for like any other work. If that goes well and the business is one I want to be in, it converts: I take equity or a share of revenue and move from working on the business to being in it. Neither of us commits to the second step at the start, and most engagements simply finish instead.
It depends on what the business is for, not on what I'd prefer. Equity suits companies building toward a raise or an exit, where the value being created is the company itself. Revenue share suits established, profitable businesses with no exit planned, where the point is to make the machine run better and split what that produces. A company heading for a sale and a family business with good margins want opposite structures, and the deal should follow that.
Because a fee pays me for hours and ownership pays me for whether it worked, and the second is the incentive you actually want me to have. It also filters the work: I can only say yes to a business I believe will be worth owning a piece of, which means the ones I take on get the version of me that has something at stake.
Usually revenue that already exists, a founder who wants a partner rather than extra capacity, and a problem in the model, the positioning or the operations that I can actually move. Pre-revenue is a bias rather than a rule — if the idea is interesting enough I will look at it, and that is often where an operating partner is worth the most. I take on very few at a time either way: there is one of me, and a partnership is measured in years.
Operating judgement doesn't parallelise, so one person is the right size for the part I do. When a business I'm in needs software built, that goes to The Creative Collective, the studio I co-run — which is part of what makes this worth more than a check. When it needs other capacity, we hire it into the company where it belongs rather than renting it from me.
I'm in South Florida — Fort Lauderdale and Broward County, working across Miami-Dade and Palm Beach in person. Partnerships elsewhere in the United States run remote-first with periodic on-site time. Being in the room matters more for this than it does for advisory work, so geography is a real factor in what I take on rather than a formality.
It's quoted as a fixed fee against a defined scope, so the number is agreed before anything starts and doesn't move unless the scope does. What drives it is how much of the problem I take on and how long it runs. You get a real number after one conversation, at no charge — and that conversation is also how I work out whether there's a partnership in it, so it's worth having either way.
The first conversation is free and it's the one that matters: what the business is, what's in the way, and whether there's something here worth both of us committing to. Most of them end with a scoped engagement. A few end with a partnership.
I'd rather own a piece than send an invoice.
Fort Lauderdale, FL — working across South Florida and remote nationwide.What to include
The more specific you are, the more useful our first reply is.